Reviews, updates and in depth guides to your favourite mobile games - AppGamer.com
|
|
Flyer |
Page: 1 2 | Reply |
Mar 11th 2004 | #145057 Report |
Member since: Mar 18th 2001 Posts: 223 |
I'm no moral crucader (perhaps I am in your eyes) Yes you are. Very much, in fact, I think your reply was pethatic. Even if the visitors of the party were 15, it would be fine. It's a goddamn nipple for christ sake, no hardcore porn or something like that. I don't know where you are from, but my guess is United States, the country in wich a celebrity nipple causes a riot, while the rest of the world was laughing at it and broadcastig it over and over again...haha Sex is everywhere buddy, get used to it! |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Mar 11th 2004 | #145061 Report |
Member since: May 12th 2003 Posts: 1088 |
[QUOTE=ZDevil::2001] a celebrity nipple causes a riot, [/QUOTE] your arguing about a nipple, grow up. . . . {also he's not pathetic he just has differnt veiws |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Mar 11th 2004 | #145066 Report |
Member since: Mar 18th 2001 Posts: 223 |
[QUOTE='mikeydude[uk]']your arguing about a nipple, grow up. . . . {also he's not pathetic he just has differnt veiws[/QUOTE] 1. I'm not arguing about a nipple, where did you find me arguing about a nipple? 2. I never said he was pethatic. I said his reply was, and is. 3. Please don't tell me to grow up, mr. 15 year old. Instead, tell me if you were offended by the nipple on that flyer in any way. That way we'll clear this whole issue up... |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Mar 11th 2004 | #145073 Report |
Member since: Mar 25th 2002 Posts: 1143 |
I don't see how my reply can be seen as pathetic just because I hold a different view to your own and have expressed that view. Not that it matters I live in UK and I can assure you that I hold no repression over naked women or indeed pornography. My problem with your flyers use of nipples was one of context, I thought I made that clear in my subsequent posts, I even clarified my view in my last post. My question is I suppose, how do you justify the use of your subject matter when you are advertising a mixed sex event? How did you come about the final choice of subject? Finally you asked for opinions in your original post, I freely took you up on that offer, I hardly see a need for you to get so antsy about it. I can assure you that at thritysomething my life experiences have encompassed a pretty wide spectrum of activities, I am not a prude nor am I po-faced. |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Mar 11th 2004 | #145074 Report |
Member since: Jul 19th 2003 Posts: 810 |
actually...... I was a little offended...... I used to be into lots of things.... but it's really unnessescary.... and in my opinion shouldnt be there ..... thats my opinion
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Mar 11th 2004 | #145077 Report |
Member since: Mar 18th 2001 Posts: 223 |
[QUOTE=thehermit]I don't see how my reply can be seen as pathetic just because I hold a different view to your own and have expressed that view. Not that it matters I live in UK and I can assure you that I hold no repression over naked women or indeed pornography. My problem with your flyers use of nipples was one of context, I thought I made that clear in my subsequent posts, I even clarified my view in my last post. My question is I suppose, how do you justify the use of your subject matter when you are advertising a mixed sex event? How did you come about the final choice of subject? Finally you asked for opinions in your original post, I freely took you up on that offer, I hardly see a need for you to get so antsy about it. I can assure you that at thritysomething my life experiences have encompassed a pretty wide spectrum of activities, I am not a prude nor am I po-faced.[/QUOTE] First of all Hermit, really, don't feel offended at all man, nothing personal going on here 2nd, maybe you are right, pethatic is not the word I should have used, more like "a little bit overreacting", it's just a nipple. I'm not english see, don't want to use it as an excuse, but I don't always pick my words carefully. 3rd, I am not the topic poster, don't blame him I am not looking to start a fight or big arguement here. I respect your opinion as you respect mine, I'll re-read my post before posting next time. I was just laughing over the whole Janet Jackson thing again, wich I also used to call pathetic, but I guess I mean over-reacted there too. Besides your english is very hard to read, pretty intellectual, and I think I may have interpretted it the wrong way. No hard feelings okay, i'm sorry for this confusion... |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Mar 11th 2004 | #145079 Report |
Member since: Mar 10th 2004 Posts: 4 |
@thehermit: I realy can't understand your reaction on such an harmless flyer! Its defenetly an overreaction and hard to understand! I get the impession that you live in an complete different world(but it's not mine/generation conflict?/how old are you?)!!What do you anticipate from an flyer which has the funktion to entice as much people as possible! It shoult express fun and party and I hope it fulfills this expectations!! Sorry if this flyer offended you or doesn't fit to your picture of equality but there are flyers, which not show only a nippel but....... I think we should stop this argue and concentrate on the flyer and if its appealing! Up to this point I want to thank all the people who participated P.s:hope my english is not that bad, so you can understand me :D |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Mar 11th 2004 | #145080 Report |
Member since: Apr 5th 2001 Posts: 2544 |
Ok, nice that you two sorted it out yourself. Just try to not get on the personal side. About the image, it's really nice graphically wise but I do agree that I don't understand why there is a naked girl on there, sex sells is a silly arguement unless you are trying to pimp out hookers or selling sex dolls. It's a flyer for a party... nothing more. I'm not offended by it, hell... i'm from holland... land without rules (;))... It's just that I don't see a need for a half naked girl there. It's more like, you used it because you could. It's not making the image any better, thats all I mean. |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Mar 11th 2004 | #145093 Report |
Member since: Feb 26th 2004 Posts: 96 |
guys there is just one thing to say : I DONT CARE WHAT THErE IS IN THE POSTER AS LONG THAT IT IS , Something we all share GOOD ArT < this is what it all about , also lemme add this dont u people have cables , tv stations , all the freakin shows adds cotains ladies and nudity sometimes so what the big deal over here , all of u made a fight regarding to a silly matter , and forgot the main subject were regarding at which is the work of art . :P thanks i rest my case ;] |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Mar 12th 2004 | #145113 Report |
Member since: Mar 25th 2002 Posts: 1143 |
Once again I am not offended per se by it, just that it makes little sense and I wonder at the logic behind that marketing decision, I just thought that it was misplaced rather than wrong. Horses for courses as it were, it just seems that you have included it "for the boys" rather than taken a considered design decision. As you say, I have no wish to make this personal or to hijack your thread for critiques, I don't deny your strategy may be sound. |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Page: 1 2 | Back to top |
Please login or register above to post in this forum |
© Web Media Network Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without written permission. Photoshop is a registered trademark of Adobe Inc.. TeamPhotoshop.com is not associated in any way with Adobe, nor is an offical Photoshop website. |