Reviews, updates and in depth guides to your favourite mobile games - AppGamer.com
|
|
nasty flyer |
Page: 1 2 | Reply |
Jun 13th 2004 | #153212 Report |
Member since: Jan 21st 2002 Posts: 69 |
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jun 13th 2004 | #153213 Report |
Member since: May 10th 2004 Posts: 223 |
I like the first one more. 8^/ It just seems to be visually clearer. My eyes can easily get a grip on what I'm looking at and then appreciate it. The second one is good, it's obviously quality work. But my initial reaction to it was "ok what am I looking at?" Of course it only took me a brief moment for my brain to put it all together and then I could clearly see and appreciate this one as well. Now I'm not saying 1 is better than 2. But I do think it's clearer and more readily connects with the viewer. And looking at it from that perspective I can understand how your client would have a preference for #1. And no that doesn't make you insane. That makes you an artist. I'm guessing you like #2 better because you feel it's more "artistic"...it conveys the sensuality as more of a feast for the eyes. And that's all true. But, to me anyways, #2 looks like it'd be more appropriate for a magazine ad or CD cover or insert. Ya know what I mean? And likewise I think the clear simplicity of #1 is more apt for a flyer. ...if any of that made any sense. ;) |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jun 13th 2004 | #153214 Report |
Member since: Jan 21st 2002 Posts: 69 |
... sounds like my client. but i know what you mean, the only thing people dont understand in this case is that flyer have to "catch your look" at first and after that bring the information to the ppl. thats why i think the second one is more effective for reason of the client... but at the end it doent matter to me
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jun 13th 2004 | #153233 Report |
Member since: Jun 3rd 2003 Posts: 1867 |
Those links are Super Broken!
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jun 13th 2004 | #153235 Report |
Member since: Sep 16th 2002 Posts: 1876 |
I get scary-sounding German writing when I click those. :eek:
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jun 14th 2004 | #153260 Report |
Member since: May 10th 2004 Posts: 223 |
Well, I still have the images, they are in my browser cache. But I don't think I should display them. They are Michi's to display or not display.
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jun 14th 2004 | #153264 Report |
Member since: Jun 3rd 2003 Posts: 1867 |
Are you stupid? If he was opposed to displaying them, he never would have created this post and attempted to link to them in the first place.
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jun 14th 2004 | #153275 Report |
Member since: Jan 21st 2002 Posts: 69 |
omfg... my partner has moved the entire site... :( Links fixed, sry guys!!! |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jun 14th 2004 | #153277 Report |
Member since: Sep 16th 2002 Posts: 1876 |
I like the first one more... it's more classy and smooth and elegant. It looks good.
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jun 14th 2004 | #153279 Report |
Member since: Jan 2nd 2003 Posts: 177 |
Jerk :P I think the first one is a lot better, mainly because the woman's more visible/attractice. I am also opposed to the smoke/randomish lightning effects, but I think that's just me. Stick with the first, it's simple and slick |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Page: 1 2 | Back to top |
Please login or register above to post in this forum |
© Web Media Network Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without written permission. Photoshop is a registered trademark of Adobe Inc.. TeamPhotoshop.com is not associated in any way with Adobe, nor is an offical Photoshop website. |