TeamPhotoshop
Reviews, updates and in depth guides to your favourite mobile games - AppGamer.com
Forum Home Latest Posts Search Help Subscribe

B&W image manipulation (adult content)

Page: 1 2 Reply
Oct 24th 2002#75235 Report
Member since: Jul 15th 2002
Posts: 65
Ok so I didn't do as much altering to the first image, but the second one took at least 1000 clicks and +10 layers. Censured explained the basic idea behind the pics. There is no real story. I take it you don't see they would qualify as a piece of art in it's own category. That's just fine.. a little more "why" would be nice.

For the second pic.. "It"'s supposed to growing in her face. I didn't do any airbrushing to it, so it may not look as round.. dunno. It could be missing a shadow or something. Thanks for pointing that one out.
Reply with Quote Reply
Oct 24th 2002#75238 Report
Member since: Aug 12th 2002
Posts: 1693
...and I like how you grunged up the background of image 2
That's very nice



Originally posted by natpoit

:D I want HORROR!!! :p


Here is my horror to you... LoL
http://www.kolumbus.fi/dj.charisma/bjorn/images/wall/spagetti.jpg

That's the worst I could give you
Reply with Quote Reply
Oct 24th 2002#75239 Report
Member since: Oct 17th 2002
Posts: 347
yeah, i agree with quality of 2nd image. It's really more better (ok my english? ;) ) . And- i've visited your site and i'm sure that you can draw good. Probably 1st link has broken my impression. Anyway, thanks.
Reply with Quote Reply
Oct 24th 2002#75240 Report
Member since: Oct 17th 2002
Posts: 347
Censured, thanks! i've got it :D
Reply with Quote Reply
Oct 25th 2002#75276 Report
Member since: Mar 25th 2002
Posts: 1143
The concept is ok if you are into this kind of thing, not my personal taste, but dont worry I am sure I can be objective;)

The first image is probably the more accomplished of the two, the second one looks a little incomplete or abandoned. I think both images suffer from the same problem, there is a palpable lack of fine detail to really draw the voyeur (not viewer in this case) in. The first image dissapoints with what is a fascinating subject, in part due to a lack of exploration into the subject. Perhaps rather than the total female nudity it would of been nice if you had explored the point some more. A close up of a specific part of the anatomy with detailed innerworkings is inevitably the crux of the message you are trying to convey, I would like this to be explored more.
Reply with Quote Reply
Oct 29th 2002#75938 Report
Member since: Oct 3rd 2002
Posts: 59
Moderator Edit : Please start your own thead. Thank you.
Reply with Quote Reply
Nov 19th 2002#79060 Report
Member since: Nov 19th 2002
Posts: 56
i like the first one but maybe make the skin a bit visible from the side? u only see a hloe and not tht thikness of the skin..know what i mean?
Reply with Quote Reply
Nov 19th 2002#79100 Report
Member since: Apr 12th 2002
Posts: 438
AP tut.. you're @#$%ed up.
Reply with Quote Reply
Nov 20th 2002#79192 Report
Member since: Feb 12th 2002
Posts: 271
I guess not everyone can be as normal as you, mr "Dick Senormous"
Reply with Quote Reply
Nov 20th 2002#79213 Report
Member since: Apr 12th 2002
Posts: 438
lmao.. Dude It's one thing to make it look like you have a bloody nose or a slice across your cheek.. But he's removing all the layers of skin and showing the intestines.. I dunno that's a little too much for me.. Heh
Reply with Quote Reply
Page: 1 2 Back to top
Please login or register above to post in this forum