Reviews, updates and in depth guides to your favourite mobile games - AppGamer.com
|
|
B&W image manipulation (adult content) |
Page: 1 2 | Reply |
Oct 24th 2002 | #75235 Report |
Member since: Jul 15th 2002 Posts: 65 |
Ok so I didn't do as much altering to the first image, but the second one took at least 1000 clicks and +10 layers. Censured explained the basic idea behind the pics. There is no real story. I take it you don't see they would qualify as a piece of art in it's own category. That's just fine.. a little more "why" would be nice. For the second pic.. "It"'s supposed to growing in her face. I didn't do any airbrushing to it, so it may not look as round.. dunno. It could be missing a shadow or something. Thanks for pointing that one out. |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Oct 24th 2002 | #75238 Report |
Member since: Aug 12th 2002 Posts: 1693 |
...and I like how you grunged up the background of image 2 That's very nice Here is my horror to you... LoL http://www.kolumbus.fi/dj.charisma/bjorn/images/wall/spagetti.jpg That's the worst I could give you |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Oct 24th 2002 | #75239 Report |
Member since: Oct 17th 2002 Posts: 347 |
yeah, i agree with quality of 2nd image. It's really more better (ok my english? ;) ) . And- i've visited your site and i'm sure that you can draw good. Probably 1st link has broken my impression. Anyway, thanks.
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Oct 24th 2002 | #75240 Report |
Member since: Oct 17th 2002 Posts: 347 |
Censured, thanks! i've got it :D
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Oct 25th 2002 | #75276 Report |
Member since: Mar 25th 2002 Posts: 1143 |
The concept is ok if you are into this kind of thing, not my personal taste, but dont worry I am sure I can be objective;) The first image is probably the more accomplished of the two, the second one looks a little incomplete or abandoned. I think both images suffer from the same problem, there is a palpable lack of fine detail to really draw the voyeur (not viewer in this case) in. The first image dissapoints with what is a fascinating subject, in part due to a lack of exploration into the subject. Perhaps rather than the total female nudity it would of been nice if you had explored the point some more. A close up of a specific part of the anatomy with detailed innerworkings is inevitably the crux of the message you are trying to convey, I would like this to be explored more. |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Oct 29th 2002 | #75938 Report |
Member since: Oct 3rd 2002 Posts: 59 |
Moderator Edit : Please start your own thead. Thank you.
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Nov 19th 2002 | #79060 Report |
Member since: Nov 19th 2002 Posts: 56 |
i like the first one but maybe make the skin a bit visible from the side? u only see a hloe and not tht thikness of the skin..know what i mean?
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Nov 19th 2002 | #79100 Report |
Member since: Apr 12th 2002 Posts: 438 |
AP tut.. you're @#$%ed up.
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Nov 20th 2002 | #79192 Report |
Member since: Feb 12th 2002 Posts: 271 |
I guess not everyone can be as normal as you, mr "Dick Senormous"
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Nov 20th 2002 | #79213 Report |
Member since: Apr 12th 2002 Posts: 438 |
lmao.. Dude It's one thing to make it look like you have a bloody nose or a slice across your cheek.. But he's removing all the layers of skin and showing the intestines.. I dunno that's a little too much for me.. Heh
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Page: 1 2 | Back to top |
Please login or register above to post in this forum |
© Web Media Network Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without written permission. Photoshop is a registered trademark of Adobe Inc.. TeamPhotoshop.com is not associated in any way with Adobe, nor is an offical Photoshop website. |