Reviews, updates and in depth guides to your favourite mobile games - AppGamer.com
|
|
How Much Would You Be Willing To Pay? |
Page: 1 2 | Reply |
Jun 7th 2003 | #107083 Report |
Member since: Mar 3rd 2003 Posts: 640 |
If you had to buy a new camera, what would you be willing to pay? **This is a desperate attempt to liven up this section** |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jun 7th 2003 | #107159 Report |
Member since: May 23rd 2003 Posts: 25 |
depends on the camera
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jun 7th 2003 | #107209 Report |
Member since: Apr 25th 2003 Posts: 1977 |
yeah...totally depends on needs/features. I mean i dropped $500 on my camera faster than you can say camera lol. In my case..if i had to buy a new one...i would probably go 1 or 2000 dollars maybe (thats if i had the money)
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jun 7th 2003 | #107210 Report |
Member since: Sep 16th 2002 Posts: 1876 |
$7.99 for a black/white, Safeway brand, single use, film camera.
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jun 8th 2003 | #107417 Report |
Member since: Mar 3rd 2003 Posts: 640 |
Haha. I payed about 600 can for mine.
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jun 9th 2003 | #107465 Report |
Member since: Apr 25th 2003 Posts: 1977 |
Actually ive changed my mind. Ispired by Malevolent_Jester... im going to make a kids pinhole camera... basically poke a hole in a shoebox and tape a piece of wax paper inside. I think thats a cheap as it can get lol edit: Funny thing is that 7.99 camera probably beats all our expensive digitals. Film always beats digital. |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jun 9th 2003 | #107467 Report |
Member since: Sep 16th 2002 Posts: 1876 |
And the $7.99 one floats!
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jul 4th 2003 | #111605 Report |
Member since: Mar 3rd 2003 Posts: 640 |
Nothing beats that, ahah.
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jul 11th 2003 | #113009 Report |
Member since: Jul 9th 2003 Posts: 156 |
I'll put in my 2 cents to liven up this section too ;) . I saw a pretty funny bit on comedy central about digital cameras, The Daily Show to be precise. If you haven't seen it, it basically poked fun at the usefullness of the digital camera. The size/price/errors/bugs/and of course the cost of a printer and gloss paper to print out the photos for yourself at sub-standard quality and greater cost . But for some reason we all love the digital camera, even though you can get your pictures from a normal camera put on CD along with your normal, high quality prints. But alas the old problem of human reasoning: short term gratification vs. long term benefit. Then again, if you never want gloss prints of your photos, you don't have to spend all that mony for all that glossy picture paper for that wonderful do-it-yourself look.
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jul 16th 2003 | #113966 Report |
Member since: Jul 15th 2003 Posts: 4 |
I don't know bout that. The photography company that I work for went digital last year and I thought that well there goes the bussiness. Well I was wrong we get better quality pictures now than we did with film and our prints look better in most cases. :D if you don't believe me go to our site www.thsphoto.com/neidel I'd suggest that you look at union city on sun if you look go toward the last pages those are the coolest ones. and yes all of these are done with a digital camera. These photo's are all shot with a Canon eos 1 d with a fixed 2.8 lens if you look at any of the night time shots we do have a flash system that we set up around the arena for lighting. I hope that you enjoy
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Page: 1 2 | Back to top |
Please login or register above to post in this forum |
© Web Media Network Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without written permission. Photoshop is a registered trademark of Adobe Inc.. TeamPhotoshop.com is not associated in any way with Adobe, nor is an offical Photoshop website. |