Reviews, updates and in depth guides to your favourite mobile games - AppGamer.com
|
|
Resizing pixilation |
Page: 1 | Reply |
Aug 9th 2009 | #198263 Report |
Member since: Aug 9th 2009 Posts: 1 |
Hey, I am very new to photoshop and I have a very large Jpg, the size of a movie poster (27 inches x 41 inches). I am trying to make the entire thing the size of a postcard. When I make it smaller it becomes pixilated. It was 300 dpi before I resized and now I can see pixels. Am I resizing it wrong? Is there a different way I can resize it? Thanks.
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Aug 9th 2009 | #198264 Report |
Member since: Sep 11th 2007 Posts: 270 |
hi, what you might try when you go to resize... there on the drop down pick either bicubic sharper or bicubic smooth ... one of those wil generally give you much better results when drasticaly reduce the size ........ |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Aug 15th 2009 | #198328 Report |
Member since: Aug 13th 2009 Posts: 28 |
The difference you're seeing is the way that edges and straight lines, especially diagonals, are re-sampled using bi-linear as opposed to bi-cubic sampling. Bi-cubic will always add some 'anti-aliasing' interpolation to straight edges. This makes it far superior for increasing the size of an image, but can give much softer looking edges when downsizing.Having said that, I've never bothered to change resampling modes from bi-cubic when reducing the size of an image. I find that either the standard sharpen filter followed by some 'fade sharpen' works well, or the use of the unsharp mask tool. Maybe your images contain a lot of straight lines, like architecture pics perhaps?
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Page: 1 | Back to top |
Please login or register above to post in this forum |
© Web Media Network Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without written permission. Photoshop is a registered trademark of Adobe Inc.. TeamPhotoshop.com is not associated in any way with Adobe, nor is an offical Photoshop website. |