![]() |
Reviews, updates and in depth guides to your favourite mobile games - AppGamer.com
|
|
How do you create a gradual transparency? |
Page: 1 | Reply |
Feb 23rd 2003 | #92182 Report |
![]() Posts: 3 |
This might be a really obvious question, but I was wondering... If I was to have a rectangular object or something... how could I apply a gradient of sorts that makes it starts completely solid, but gradually becomes more and more transparent? Thanks. |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Feb 23rd 2003 | #92241 Report |
![]() Posts: 316 |
i'm pretty sure each layer can only have one transparency level...
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Feb 23rd 2003 | #92263 Report |
![]() Posts: 70 |
Have you tried creating a layer mask with a gradient?
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Feb 24th 2003 | #92385 Report |
![]() Posts: 46 |
Ok. Load your image or copy it onto a transparant bg. Then, go to channels pallet, create new channel. Next, select the gradient tool(where the paintbucket is), and pick the gradient that goes from white to transparant. Make sure your new channel is selected in the pallet. click the side of the image you want to be transparant(start about a 10th of the way away from the edge) and drag toward where you want it solid(end about 1/4th of the way away from that edge) Go to layers pallet, click the layer with the image. Go to select/load selection. Then in the channel box, select Alpha1. Click OK Hit Delete. Then, make a background layer that is white or whatever the background needs to be. Any questions, just reply. |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Feb 24th 2003 | #92477 Report |
![]() Posts: |
jagpunk: You seem to know your way around PS based on your detailed suggestion. My followup question would be... I would have just suggested the same thing crsjr did. I would have simply created a layer mask and applied a gradient to get the desired result. It's editable, undo-able at a later time, and simple. Is there a reason you would go to the extra work of creating a channel to achieve what I'm assuming is a similar result, but not editable later? Please understand, I'm not calling you out; I really would like to know if the results are that much better one way or the other. Thanks. |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Feb 25th 2003 | #92544 Report |
![]() Posts: 46 |
Yeah, I guess a layer mask is easier. Neither way is better as far as end results. I just have never done it using a mask personally.
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Feb 25th 2003 | #92572 Report |
![]() Posts: 1143 |
One of the primary reasons for using channels in images is that the filesize is much smaller.
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Feb 25th 2003 | #92573 Report |
![]() Posts: 685 |
i have a basic tut on my site that might be of help to ya http://www.heathrowe.com/tutorials.asp >> 'Image Blending' touches on what malibu suggested cheers heathrowe |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Page: 1 | Back to top |
Please login or register above to post in this forum |
© Web Media Network Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without written permission. Photoshop is a registered trademark of Adobe Inc.. TeamPhotoshop.com is not associated in any way with Adobe, nor is an offical Photoshop website. |