Reviews, updates and in depth guides to your favourite mobile games - AppGamer.com
|
|
640 site design or wots the standard? |
Page: 1 | Reply |
Oct 11th 2002 | #73408 Report |
Member since: Sep 11th 2002 Posts: 24 |
Now I have been noticing most sites are setting their width's to the 640 is that still the best way to do it, or is 1024 getting more popular?? I am designing a site and I always do the width to 100% on the INITIAL table but now im seeing 640 everywhere specially this site also is doing 640... Any posts on this or if you guys know what the standard is right now appreciate any feedback... Thanks in advance! :D -mike |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Oct 11th 2002 | #73416 Report |
Member since: Aug 7th 2002 Posts: 355 |
wrong forum guy...... this is Web Site SHOWCASE but i think 640 is still the popular one becuz its the smalllest resolution and everyone can see it..... but i prefer 1024x768.... but maybe thats becuz thats my reso haha |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Oct 11th 2002 | #73418 Report |
Member since: Sep 11th 2002 Posts: 24 |
haha my bad bloke...i just thought okay its all website showcases I thought I ask these people if they are still doing it (or popular consensus) sites @ x 640 I am doing it all width="100%" but I think I might just do this new site im designing in 640 hmm... Thanks ;) |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Oct 11th 2002 | #73428 Report |
Member since: May 27th 2002 Posts: 627 |
640 is a bad idea imo. 800 is the least i work in for basics. |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Oct 11th 2002 | #73436 Report |
Member since: Mar 18th 2001 Posts: 6632 |
i do mine at 780. you have to account for the vertical scroll bars. and of course, the ideal solution is to make it stretch to any resolution. so you could have it go down to 640, but then also stretch up to 1024 or any other resolution. |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Oct 12th 2002 | #73449 Report |
Member since: Sep 28th 2002 Posts: 85 |
i go with 800*600 ....simple and good
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Oct 12th 2002 | #73455 Report |
Member since: Mar 25th 2002 Posts: 1143 |
800 x 600 wiill equate to about 744 x (doesnt really matter how long) with a scrollbar. Add 10 to the first figure if you dont have a scrollbar - (shockingly small is'nt it? lol)
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Oct 12th 2002 | #73456 Report |
Member since: Mar 25th 2002 Posts: 1143 |
go on then as I am feeling generous I did the donkey work for your ease http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/99/41/index3a_page2.html?tw=design (excuse my laziness in the link) pretty much anything you could need to know about the various browser chromes.
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Oct 12th 2002 | #73463 Report |
Member since: Oct 10th 2002 Posts: 218 |
is there a way to make it adapt to whatever the persons computer is?
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Oct 12th 2002 | #73480 Report |
Member since: Mar 18th 2001 Posts: 6632 |
Yes, by using percentages instead of set pixel widths for your tables or div tags. Try going to www.wired.com and then dragging the resize handles of your browser around to resize the page. You will see that it reformats itself in real time while you resize the browser. They use CSS for all the formatting on that site, which is why it reformats so nicely. You can do it with tables as well though. Just set everything as a percentage. You can also set certain columns to be a fixed width, like say the nav bar, and then set the width value of the content column to be "*" which uses the leftover space after it draws in the set width for the navbar column. |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Page: 1 | Back to top |
Please login or register above to post in this forum |
© Web Media Network Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without written permission. Photoshop is a registered trademark of Adobe Inc.. TeamPhotoshop.com is not associated in any way with Adobe, nor is an offical Photoshop website. |