Reviews, updates and in depth guides to your favourite mobile games - AppGamer.com
|
|
IPM.com Stairs to Success Mockup |
Page: 1 | Reply |
Jan 6th 2003 | #84676 Report |
Member since: Oct 26th 2002 Posts: 103 |
I don't usually post mockups. But I thought I'd post this one and get some comments.. Please note, I took the picture as well.. http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/1123227 |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jan 6th 2003 | #84700 Report |
Member since: Aug 4th 2001 Posts: 134 |
Very nice. Clean, neat, organised, what can I say...
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jan 6th 2003 | #84701 Report |
Member since: Mar 24th 2002 Posts: 3114 |
yeah...huge header tho, but it's such a nice header, so....... :p Looks cozy. :D |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jan 6th 2003 | #84708 Report |
Member since: Mar 18th 2001 Posts: 6632 |
Very professional looking design. Though like Paavo said, the header is pretty big, and you can only see the "why choose IPM" text before you have to scroll. The navigation could be a little more prominent on the page... I didn't notice it for quite a while. Plus it is all run together very closely and hard to separate each link without reading it like a paragraph of text, which I think is bad. I'd take off the navigate our site text... It serves no purpose and is actually more confusing. I thought it would be a menu that would pop-up if I clicked on the text, but then I finally saw the nav below it. I saw on DeviantArt some people don't like your pixel stretch because it's "overused" but I really don't think it's a big deal because the people that will actually be using that site have never seen it before. It's just all these designers that get burned out on things. The general public never sees that kind of stuff. I'm guessing you don't have control over the content of the site... But I really don't understand what it is they do. Just a bunch of marketing jargon and technical terms. But it looks like the site is geared toward IT to IT, so hopefully the users will know what they're talking about. |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jan 6th 2003 | #84754 Report |
Member since: Sep 6th 2001 Posts: 3893 |
I think it looks great RUV.... the header is a bit big, but it doesnt really make the site look "bad." Another thing that i have to agree on that the others stated was the navigation, I do think that needs to either be changed or worked on some more, it is pretty hard to tell where one link ends and the other one start... But all and all i think the site looks great... styleish, but still has some professionalism to it.. nice work :D |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jan 25th 2003 | #87423 Report |
Member since: Mar 25th 2002 Posts: 1143 |
As has been said, looks very clean but the header should be smaller. All important elements (as I know u know ;) ) should be above the 'fold' (410px). Otherwise very nice indeed.
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jan 25th 2003 | #87424 Report |
Member since: Mar 25th 2002 Posts: 1143 |
On another note, sexy use of the pixel drag, it has a nice, almost airbrushed quality to it and the tonality is sublime.
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Jan 25th 2003 | #87448 Report |
Member since: Oct 26th 2002 Posts: 103 |
the client rejected it
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Page: 1 | Back to top |
Please login or register above to post in this forum |
© Web Media Network Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without written permission. Photoshop is a registered trademark of Adobe Inc.. TeamPhotoshop.com is not associated in any way with Adobe, nor is an offical Photoshop website. |