![]() |
Reviews, updates and in depth guides to your favourite mobile games - AppGamer.com
|
|
Test your download and upload speeds |
Page: 1 2 3 4 | Reply |
Feb 14th 2004 | #142105 Report |
![]() Posts: 180 |
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 136.14Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 676.82kb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem you people with the 1, 3 or 4 Mbit dl rates....are you at home or at work with those speeds ? if you're at home...consider yourself lucky. I gotta try this thing out at work monday.... |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Feb 14th 2004 | #142110 Report |
![]() Posts: 672 |
damn, I get a red x where there is the start button :(
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Feb 14th 2004 | #142133 Report |
![]() Posts: 3734 |
I'm at home, and I know that most others are also. 3Mbit cable is pretty much the standard in the US now. You'd be pretty hard-pressed to find a company offering any less than download speeds of 3Mb and upload of 256Kb. Out here in the middle of the US (Iowa) DSL is pretty nonexistent, since we're so spread out.
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Feb 14th 2004 | #142134 Report |
![]() Posts: 1496 |
Home, Cable is very common in these areas (city), so we have very good ISP's. I am on "Cox" right now... *begins to snicker at the name*
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Feb 14th 2004 | #142143 Report |
![]() Posts: 3367 |
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 104.70Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 548.82kb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.4.2_03 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode No network congestion discovered. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 718.91 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and No packet loss was observed. This connection is receiver limited 60.04% of the time. Increasing the current receive buffer (62.0 KB) will improve performance This connection is network limited 39.93% of the time. Contact your local network administrator to report a network problem |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Feb 14th 2004 | #142145 Report |
![]() Posts: 143 |
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 221.42Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 1.31Mb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Feb 14th 2004 | #142148 Report |
![]() Posts: 1391 |
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 156.26Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 1.70Mb/s |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Feb 14th 2004 | #142160 Report |
![]() Posts: 180 |
[QUOTE=mattboy_slim]I'm at home, and I know that most others are also. 3Mbit cable is pretty much the standard in the US now. You'd be pretty hard-pressed to find a company offering any less than download speeds of 3Mb and upload of 256Kb. Out here in the middle of the US (Iowa) DSL is pretty nonexistent, since we're so spread out.[/QUOTE] *is jealous* man...here in Germany there are practically no providers that i know of that offer cable or any other medium with those speeds at a reasonable price...you'd have to be a company to afford it. The providers here are doing the "Intel" thing.....slowly bringing faster and faster connection speeds to the market to suck more money out of the consumers and sell more of their products and services in volume. If you don't know what i mean with the "intel" thing, just go out any buy a brand new Intel or AMD CPU and look at the manufacturing date that is printed on the chip...the 2.5-3GHz chips on the market now were manufactured in 1998 and 1999....yeah..imagine what they have in storage now.... |
Reply with Quote Reply |
Feb 14th 2004 | #142166 Report |
![]() Posts: 1496 |
Dang, any computer you buy here automatically comes with AT LEAST 2.66 ghz. :p
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Feb 14th 2004 | #142168 Report |
![]() Posts: 1028 |
What he's saying is that the companies have had the advanced technology for years but choose to release them slowly step by step to make more money off of them.
|
Reply with Quote Reply |
Page: 1 2 3 4 | Back to top |
Please login or register above to post in this forum |
© Web Media Network Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without written permission. Photoshop is a registered trademark of Adobe Inc.. TeamPhotoshop.com is not associated in any way with Adobe, nor is an offical Photoshop website. |